Mar
Wed
10
This is a modern version of the "cosmological argument" (good article on it in Wikipedia) that dates back at least as far as Thomas Aquinas. This question has come up before the almost the same words, which suggests to me that it comes originally from course materials.
If you already believe in a god, you may regard the Big Bang, and the fact that living things are capable of evolution, as examples of his/her glorious works.
But if you don't, invoking a god to explain these things is not really very satisfactory, because the explanation invoked is at least as mysterious as the thing to be explained.
I am not sure that this is what your teacher wants to hear, but it's how it is.
Courage!
No I honestly can't. And I am not looking for cheap points. I know in my
spirit that God exists and He liveth. JOHN 3: 16.
Nor can I subscribe to evolution, Nor that I am a descendant of an Amoeba. Nothing begets nothing. Common sense does tell me that,
also ' The Bible says we are made in Gods image, if he didn't, who created us with all our senses, not the Amoeba that's for sure, or its evolvement.
It would be flippent to say God created using 'The Big Bang' to create.
I believe there are Christian Teachers who subscribe to this theory,
if I did this would be a cop out on my part to go along with the flow.
Pee - Wee
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_p...
EDIT: anthropic principle does not necessarily include God in its definition.
#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |
- edit
